Tech watchdog calls on Facebook Oversight Board members to demand real power or resign

Tech watchdog calls on Facebook Oversight Board members to demand real power or resign

A brand new policy-focused nonprofit that emerged from the latest wave of huge tech scrutiny is looking for members of Facebook’s Oversight Board to both step up or step down. In an open letter, Accountable Tech urges the 5 U.S.-based Facebook Oversight Board members to “demand the Board be given actual authority” or stop their positions.

“Each of you have been chosen to serve on this Board due to your outspoken dedication to free expression, human rights, and democratic values,” the letter’s authors write. “Now is the time to uphold these rules. We humbly ask that you simply refuse to be complicit on this Facebook charade –– that you simply demand sweeping and fast adjustments, or stroll away.”

Accountable Tech is a progressive venture based by grassroots marketing campaign organizer and director of the 2017 Tax March Nicole Gill and Jesse Lehrich, who served as international coverage spokesperson for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid. Lehrich labored on the Clinton marketing campaign’s response to Russian disinformation efforts that 12 months, giving him a entrance row seat to rising on-line threats to U.S. elections.

Read More:  Carta’s former marketing VP, who spearheaded its report on pay inequality, is suing over gender discrimination

“Facebook focuses on window dressing,” Gill advised TechCrunch. “They have been touting the Oversight Board for years as this grandiose resolution, however the platform’s issues are extra pressing than ever, and the Board is powerless.”

A handful of different teams additionally signed the open letter, together with the Center For American Progress Action Fund, Free Press and the Sierra Club. The letter cites findings from Facebook’s latest civil rights audit that forged doubt on the board’s actual energy and in addition notes the oversight physique’s delayed timeline. First introduced in late 2018, the board received’t be up and operating in time for the 2020 election.

We perceive many individuals are anticipating the Board to formally start our job of offering impartial oversight of Facebook’s content material selections. We share this urgency, however the Board received’t be operational till late Fall.

— Oversight Board (@OversightBoard) July 7, 2020

Because it’s ostensibly tasked with making selections about what content material ought to be faraway from Facebook and Instagram, in idea the board might have performed a job in ridding these platforms of election-related misinformation — a looming risk with November across the nook. But restrictive bylaws coupled with a give attention to reviewing content material takedowns relatively than content material left up meant the oversight effort was broadly considered toothless from the outset.

Read More:  Bandcamp is donating its share of sales to the NAACP for Juneteenth

Blistering civil rights audit raises alarms about Facebook’s ongoing coverage failures

Board apart, Facebook is making some efforts to at the least disseminate helpful voting info to customers, a defensive posture the corporate feels extra snug in in comparison with taking part in offense towards potential rule breaking. Last week, the corporate rolled out information labels that hyperlink to vetted election info on all voting-related posts from federal elected officers, a function that may quickly broaden to all voting posts within the U.S.

In early June, Accountable Tech launched a memorable Facebook advert marketing campaign focusing on the corporate’s staff on their very own platform. The adverts, which urged Facebook staff to carry the corporate to account, got here a day after some staff staged a digital walkout to protest a now-infamous put up wherein the president threatened to shoot folks protesting the police killing of George Floyd.

Facebook additionally confronted scrutiny lately for internet hosting Trump’s false claims about mail-in voting and people falsehoods stay dwell on the platform with out context or correction. These cases and others are trigger for concern because the stakes for social platforms in the course of the 2020 election inch increased and better, worries made specific by the open letter’s authors.

Read More:  Thirty Madison raises $47 million for its direct to consumer treatments of hair loss, migraines and indigestion

“As we enter an unprecedented election season—amid a worldwide pandemic, an inflection level for racial justice, and a disaster of fact—we can’t settle for Facebook’s poisonous establishment, a lot much less a toothless Oversight Board that lends it a false air of legitimacy.”

With advertiser boycott rising, lawmakers press Facebook on white supremacy


Add comment